This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Rerkasem, K. Articles by Guntawongwan, K. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rerkasem, K. Articles by Guntawongwan, K. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A Multidisciplinary Diabetic Foot Protocol at Chiang Mai University Hospital: Cost and Quality of Life

Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai,Thailand, krerkase{at}mail.med.cmu.ac.th

N. Kosachunhanun

Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai,Thailand

S. Tongprasert

Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai,Thailand

K. Guntawongwan

Faculty of Economics, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai,Thailand

The consensus is that a multidisciplinary approach for patients with diabetic foot ulcer is effective in reducing the number of leg amputations. Concern remains, however, about cost and health-related quality of life issues. From August 2005 to March 2007, a multidisciplinary diabetic foot protocol (DFP) was used at the authors’ teaching hospital.There were devices to reduce pressure on the foot.After healing, there were custom-fabricated orthoses and footwear, and monitoring of progress in ambulation. All subjects were educated about diabetic foot disease and its complications and prevention.They were also instructed to call and visit the hospital if there were any signs of new lesions.This study compared responses to the short form 36 questionnaires (SF-36) about health-related quality of life and the cost of medical care for patients receiving DFP care from August 2005 to March 2007 and those who had standard care from August 2003 to July 2005.There were 56 and 40 diabetic foot ulcer patients on DFP and standard care packages, respectively. Their gender distribution and mean age were similar. The average total cost of DFP patients was significantly lower than that for standard care patients ($1127.02 and $1824.58, respectively, P = .02). DFP patients had significantly higher scores on the SF-36 for both the physical and mental health dimensions than standard care patients. It was concluded that DFP was less expensive and gave patients a better quality of life, compared to standard care. On the basis of this finding, DFP should be used by every hospital to improve outcomes for patients with diabetic foot ulcer.

Key Words: diabetes • foot ulcer • cost • quality of life • multidisciplinary team

The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds, Vol. 8, No. 3, 153-156 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/1534734609344143


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?